Carter Boyle: The Dangers of Micromanagement
Experienced leaders like Carter Boyle know how tempting it can be to
micromanage your subordinates. Many times, you may have felt like the only way
to achieve your goals is to control your organization members’ every move.
Seasoned leaders also know, however, to resist this impulse as micromanagement
can have very dangerous results.
Micromanagement is a style wherein the manager closely monitors the
work of employees. While there are instances when this approach works, it is
negatively perceived because of how it reduces employees’ freedom. Imagine
someone breathing down your neck all day. If a manager is not careful, too much
micromanagement can lead to the following:
1.
Your organization loses the element of trust. When you become too controlling, your employees begin seeing you
not as a leader, but as a despot. At the same time, you begin to doubt your
employees’ commitment and competence. Both are dangerous to an organization.
2.
You lose control over the organization. The
more you try to control your subordinates, they become less likely to follow
you.
3.
Your employees lose independence. In a
perfect organization, employees freely use their skills and experience to
benefit the business. When you establish an unreasonable amount of control over
your subordinates, they will lose their autonomy and will start depending on
your instructions for their every move.
4.
Your employees quit. Nobody likes the
feeling of being watched all day. It stifles creativity and dampens morale.
Eventually, employees will decide to quit and look for an organization where
they can feel more fulfilled and appreciated.
5.
You get tired. You can only pay
attention to so many people before you eventually get tired. If not mitigated,
your stress will take a toll on your physical and mental health.
Leaders like Carter Boyle understand that certain leadership styles
work only for specific situations. As a leader, you need to determine how a
certain style will benefit and affect your organization in the long run.
Comments
Post a Comment